Dining Over the Divide: Perspectives on Migration and Society
Introducing the Participants
Steve, 64, Canvey Island
Occupation: Former underwriter
Political history: Typically Tory, apart from when he resided in “the socialist republic of south Hackney” and supported the SDP
Amuse bouche: His specialty in underwriting was hostage situations: People often claim that insurance is dull, but it’s not when you’re discussing rescuing people from South Korea because the DPRK have activated the weapon systems”
Eva, 25, London
Occupation: Psychology graduate
Voting record: In her home country, Aotearoa, she voted a combination of progressive parties
Interesting fact: Eva has worked as a singer on cruise ships; her most extended voyage was six months, which is a long time to be on a boat
For starters
She: Steve appeared there to have a nice time, to be open
He: She seemed like a very bright, articulate, nice person
Eva: I had a tomato and mozzarella dish, mushroom pasta, and a rich sweet treat, it was very good
Key disagreement
Eva: He was certainly on the side of immigration being reduced. He thinks that British people who are native to the area, not just white British, don’t have as much access to the essential services, because more and more people are arriving. However I just don’t think the figures are so problematic
Steve: I’m for qualified migrants, I have no desire to reside in a white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant country with warm beer. But I believe that authorities have exploited immigration to fill the jobs they struggle to staff without increasing salaries. Pay are kept low, so levies have to be minimized, so we can’t do things better – spend more money on child support, on schooling, on technology
Eva: I am not deeply informed of the EU referendum, because I was 16 and not living here when it occurred. He explained it to me in a different perspective. He informed me about EU labor migrants – people could come here and receive solely the salary of the their nation of origin
Steve: The French president spent 24 months getting the EU to do away with the scheme; it was revised in 2018. Previously, posted workers coming in were undercutting local employees. Under Gordon Brown, it was petroleum staff that were brought in; later it’s been hospitality, agriculture. She understood that, because she’d worked on a cruise ship and said she was earning significantly higher than workers from other countries
Common ground
He: It would be ideal to have a different energy source, come off of oil. I don’t like pollution, I love the clean air, I appreciate rural areas. We agreed on a lot of that. But I said, “What do you think of the Scandinavian nation?” Their energy revenues soared after Ukraine started, they allocated those funds to develop eco-friendly systems
Eva: So we’re dependent on their petroleum. You can see that’s not a good way to go about things. He was in favour of continuing our own oil exploration for the small amount we’ll require in the coming years. I partially concur with him. We’re still going to use planes. We both think we should be advancing to environmentally friendly options, windfarms and hydro
Dessert topics
Eva: We touched on Islamophobia, though we avoided labeling it. He seemed concerned about radical ideologies entering – he did mention that a lot of the people in Middle Eastern countries were radical, which I didn’t think fair. I think it’s discriminatory to form opinions based on faith
He: I come from the East End. I asked her if she’d been to that district, and she said it had been modernized. Naturally, I would say that: populated by professionals. But when I go down Chrisp Street market, I look like a foreigner. People stare at me because it’s become very Muslim. She had a little look at me about that. I used the word segregated area. Eva’s got Eastern European roots – she objects to the term, to her it implies deprivation. I said, “No, it’s an area that becomes theirs.” I agreed to use a alternative term – maybe community?
Eva: I believe that Muslim people are really overrepresented in the media as doing things wrong. It seems a somewhat discriminatory, or xenophobic
Conclusion
He: I think we separated amicably. We had a embrace at the train stop
She: We both said that we’d had a lovely time